OK the more I think about it, the more I think that speech would've changed the way I feel about giant exposition dump. It's not just that they would be acknowledging how they wrote in the exposition, but also it would repurpose that strategy as an elaborate support of the speech itself. Instead, giant exposition dump comes across as clumsy, rushed, and unimaginative.
aside: so RDM can write this stuff he just doesn't know that he should CHOOSE it. *facepalm*
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-02-16 07:55 pm (UTC)OK the more I think about it, the more I think that speech would've changed the way I feel about giant exposition dump. It's not just that they would be acknowledging how they wrote in the exposition, but also it would repurpose that strategy as an elaborate support of the speech itself. Instead, giant exposition dump comes across as clumsy, rushed, and unimaginative.
aside: so RDM can write this stuff he just doesn't know that he should CHOOSE it. *facepalm*